Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell Riverside
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Catterson, J.
The instant appeal presents the issue of one party seeking to obtain through litigation and rhetoric what it plainly could not obtain from its adversaries through contract negotiations. Plaintiff claims that it is entitled to the enforcement of certain design guidelines indefinitely and absolutely. We find that it is not entitled to such enforcement because the terms of the underlying contract are plain and unambiguous. Furthermore, the contract expressly negates the possibility that its obligations were to run with the land.
In the early 1990s, Donald J. Trump…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 538 Madison Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell Riverside, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Perella Weinberg Partners LLC v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Banco Espírito Santo, S.A. v. Concessionária Do Rodoanel Oeste S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Sciascia v. Rochdale Village, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Fives 160th, LLC v. Qing ZhaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.