Legal Opinion

Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 2005No. A04-1257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

This case arises out of injuries suffered by two of respondent Soo Line Railroad Company’s employees while riding as passengers in a van operated by an employee of respondent Brown’s Crew Car. On appeal from a summary judgment, appellant Progressive Casualty Insurance Company argues that (a) the indemnity agreement under which Brown’s Crew Car must reimburse Soo Line Railroad Company for legal expenses incurred as a result of tort liability does not constitute an “insured contract” within the meaning of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company’s policy so as to fall within…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owners Insurance Company v. European Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. Marchio v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Scottsdale Insurance v. RiverbankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  5. Owners Insurance Company v. European Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API