Legal Opinion
Bannister v. Hertz Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 31, 1994No. 2249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The Hertz Corporation appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on liability in favor of Blondell Bannister. We reverse.
Lucretia Meadows rented a van from Hertz in New York City to transport several people to South Carolina for a funeral. All passengers resided in New York. The van was involved in a one-car accident in North Carolina while Meadows was driving. Bannister and her daughter were injured, and Bannister’s husband was killed.
Bannister brought actions in South Carolina against Hertz on behalf of herself, her husband, and her daughter. She later voluntarily…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Oshiek v. OshiekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Unisun Insurance v. Hertz Rental Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Brown v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Harris v. KeysAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Rogers v. LeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Kirkland Ex Rel. Moore v. Sam's East, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.