Rogers v. Lee
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, J.
Gretchen A. Rogers, as guardian ad litem (GAL) for Mark A. Malloy, brought this legal malpractice action against Kenneth E. Lee (Attorney Lee) and Law Offices of Lee & Smith, P.A. (the Law Office) (Attorney Lee and the Law Office hereinafter collectively referred to as LEE), based upon LEE’s representation of Malloy in a North Carolina workers’ compensation claim. Rogers appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of LEE on the basis that North Carolina’s substantive law applies such that the state’s statute of repose bars the legal malpractice claim. We affirm.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Rauton v. the Pullman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- SHELBY COUNTY ALA. v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ashmore ex rel. Wilson v. DoddsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Accident Insurance Company Inc v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Allen v. Blackbaud IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Allen v. Blackbaud IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Coker v. Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.