Legal Opinion

Kirkland Ex Rel. Moore v. Sam's East, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 13, 2005No. 9:03-cv-02891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DUFFY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendant Sam’s East’s (“Sam’s Club”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Loss of Consortium claim. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Sharon Moore and Eddie Kirkland individually, and Sharon Moore in her capacity as Teia Kirkland’s mother and guardian, brought this suit against Sam’s Club after Teia was injured in a motor vehicle accident involving an alleged tire failure. Plaintiffs allege that Sam’s Club failed to warn about the possible design defects in the tire and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Davis v. Kohler (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  3. Doe v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API