Legal Opinion

Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor Control

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 26, 1992No. 10121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant department of liquor control found that the plaintiffs1 (1) permitted or *615suffered a disturbance and conducted a premises in a manner which constituted a nuisance in violation of § 30-6-A24 (a)2 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, and (2) allowed an intoxicated person to loiter on its premises in violation of § 30-6-A24 (c)3 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. The defendant suspended the plaintiffs’ liquor license for five days and offered to accept a fine to be determined in amount in lieu of the suspension. General Statutes § 30-58a.

The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Rose v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Breen v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Goldberg v. Insurance DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Koval v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API