Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor Control
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant department of liquor control found that the plaintiffs1 (1) permitted or *615suffered a disturbance and conducted a premises in a manner which constituted a nuisance in violation of § 30-6-A24 (a)2 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, and (2) allowed an intoxicated person to loiter on its premises in violation of § 30-6-A24 (c)3 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. The defendant suspended the plaintiffs’ liquor license for five days and offered to accept a fine to be determined in amount in lieu of the suspension. General Statutes § 30-58a.
The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Rose v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Breen v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Goldberg v. Insurance DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Koval v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992