Koval v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff is the permittee under a restaurant beer permit for a restaurant in Wind-ham. On October 7, 1960, the defendant, acting under § 30-55 of the General Statutes, revoked the permit after a hearing in which it found that the plaintiff was an unsuitable person by reason of a violation of § 30-86 of the General Statutes, in that he, by himself, his servant or agent, delivered alcoholic liquor to four minors, whose names were stated in the order of revocation. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, which sustained the action of the commission. Prom the judgment rendered,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Bird v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Erin Wine & Liquor Store, Inc. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Rose v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schayer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- State v. HughesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
- Nelseco Navigation Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Balog v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963