Legal Opinion
Valentine v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1983No. AO18305PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
The City of Oakland and various officials for the City of Oakland and for the County of Alameda (collectively City) are respondents below in a taxpayer action for declaratory relief brought under Revenue and Taxation Code section 4808 1 by petitioner George Valentine on behalf of himself and other taxpayers similarly situated. City appeals from a judgment declaring that a property tax override levied by resolution of the Oakland City Council (Council) designated “1981 Pension Liability Fund” is void and unconstitutional as contravening article XIII A of the California…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DOCTORS'CO. INS. SERVICES v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Snelgrove v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Engs Motor Truck Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- City of Fresno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Patton v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.