Legal Opinion
City of Watsonville v. Merrill
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1982No. Docket Nos. 51098, 52952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
This is a consolidated appeal in which plaintiff City of Watsonville (City) appeals from adverse judgments rendered in favor of the respective respondents.
The essential facts leading to the present appeals may be summarized as follows.
On February 26, 1949, the City entered into a contract with the State Employees Retirement System (now the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)) which provides for the City to participate for and on behalf of its employees in PERS pursuant to the provisions of the Public Employees Retirement Law (Gov. Code, § 20000 et seq.). Said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Louis Stores, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. Yosemite Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Valentine v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Fresno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Patton v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.