Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Union Bank v. Wendland

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1976No. Civ. 33621Published

1ConcurrenceElkington, J.

I concur in the opinion of, and the result reached by, Presiding Justice Molinari.

Addressing myself to the dissent of Justice Sims, I am in agreement that, as found by the trial court, “The March 13, 1969, note [described as “the third note” in the principal opinion] was not intended by the parties to be secured by the First Deed of Trust.” But I reject the conclusion that this finding mandated the judgment entered by the superior court.

We are, as pointed out in the principal opinion, concerned with the effect of Code of Civil Procedure section 580d. This statute, and its sister sections…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API