Legal Opinion

Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire Works

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1973No. 36PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

We see no ambiguity in the terms of the contract. The entire balance due on the mortgage note is to become due and payable at the option of the mortgagee if the mortgagor:

“. . . shall convey away said mortgaged premises or if the title thereto shall become vested in any other person or persons in any manner whatsoever, unless the consent ... is first obtained.”. In Wisconsin, a state which follows the lien theory of mortgages, the mortgagee does not have legal title. The full ownership, both equitable and legal, is in the mortgagor, and the interest of the mortgagee is that of a lien holder.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Barker v. DaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kallenbach v. Lake Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Clark v. LachenmeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Shuput v. LauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API