Legal Opinion
REA Enterprises v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1975No. Civ. 45813PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from an order granting the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus directing appellants, the *601California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, etc., et al. (“State Commission”), to set aside its ruling denying a development permit to respondent, REA Enterprises, etc. (“REA”) and directing the South Coast Regional Commission (“Regional Commission”) to deliver the permit it previously had issued to REA.
The sole issue presented in this appeal involves interpretation of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (“Coastal Act”) (Pub. Res.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Kaczorowski v. Mendocino County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wheeler v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- City of San Diego v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.