Legal Opinion

Cook v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 24, 1964No. Civ. No. 64-83PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

For decision is the narrow issue of whether an employee of defendant was acting within the scope of his employment in driving defendant’s motor vehicle at the time and place in question.

Mr. Knezevich, the driver of defendant’s motor vehicle, which collided with plaintiff’s vehicle, has been employed, since 1959, by the Soil Conservation Service, an agency of defendant, and during such period of time has been stationed at Corvallis, Oregon. He is what is known as a soil scientist, is assigned to the Benton County office of the Service and works out of that office. His…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Murphey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union No. 55 v. SalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Kuroske v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  2. Elliott v. Rogers Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API