Legal Opinion
United States v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1950No. 12238_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE; Circuit Judge.
On December 22, 1949, Johnson, a citizen and resident of Contra Costa County, California, a civilian employee of the Navy upon the Island of Guam, was injured by the overturning of a vehicle in which he was riding. At the time vehicle was being driven by one Moore, a Navy chief pharmacist’s mate. Johnson brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U. S.C.A. § 1346(b). 1 He recovered judgment, and the United States, upon this appeal, asserts error in the court’s finding (1), that Moore, the driver, was acting “in line of duty”, and (2), that the injury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cain v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Seney v. Pickwick Stages Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Oliphant v. Town of Lake ProvidenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Althea G. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Lushbough Hoffman v. LushboughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. UreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.