Legal Opinion

In Re Shoup

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1950No. 31743PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The petitioner, counsel for a public transportation system, a defendant in a pending neg ligence action, seeks by a proceeding in habeas corpus in this court to be released from technical custody under a commitment by a notary public for failure to comply with a subpoena duces tecum in refusing to produce certain records for use in the taking of a deposition before such notary.

The records which the plaintiff in the negligence case seeks to have produced consist of slips of paper containing the names of witnesses procured by an employee of the transportation system after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re HydeOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re KeoughOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brookshire v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  2. Humphries v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  3. Arnovitz v. WozarOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Oehler v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. City of Dayton v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API