Legal Opinion
Duran v. New Jersey Zinc Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1971No. 9286PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the trial court entered judgment for the claimant which was, on appeal to the Court of Appeals, reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the claim was not timely filed. Section 59-10-13.6 (A), N.M.S.A., 1953 (Supp.1969) (Laws 1959, ch. 67, § 10; amended, Laws 1963, ch. 269, § 6 and Laws 1967, ch. 151, § 1) Duran v. The New Jersey Zinc Company, 82 N.M. 742, 487 P.2d 170 (Ct.App.1971). We granted certiorari, reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Gammon v. Ebasco Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Noland v. Young Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Oberman v. ObermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Gammon v. Ebasco CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moorhead v. Gray Ranch Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.