De La Torre v. Kennecott Copper Corporation
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Upon motion of defendant for rehearing, the opinion is withdrawn and the following opinion substituted therefor:
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge
Plaintiff appeals from an order that dismissed plaintiff’s complaint which sought recovery of workmen’s compensation. We reverse.
A. Plaintiff is entitled to workmen’s compensation.
Plaintiff’s complaint stated a claim for relief under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. It alleged that plaintiff was seriously injured on March 24, 1967; that he was disabled until March 23, 1968, when he resumed his full-time employment with defendant; that on May 16, 1974, six years…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Christensen v. DysartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Gomez v. Hausman CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Reed v. Fish Engineering CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Lasater v. Home Oil CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moorhead v. Gray Ranch Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lamont v. New Mexico Military InstituteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Whittenberg v. Graves Oil & Butane Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.