Legal Opinion

Blancett v. Homestake-Sapin Partners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1963No. 7267PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This action was' instituted by the appellant, plaintiff below, to recover workmen’s compensation for a knee injury which he alleged was suffered by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with appellee, defendant below, resulting in permanent partial disability and anticipated medical expenses in excess of $700.00.

At the close of the plaintiff’s case the trial court, acting pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure (§ 21-1-1 (41), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.), sustained the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and made the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hickman v. MylanderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hines v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ruiz v. HedgesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Quintana v. Trotz Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API