Legal Opinion

Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1994No. Nos. C9-94-931, C0-94-980Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Marjorie Reneau and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) challenge entry of summary judgment in favor of respondent John Tiller in State Farm’s action against Tiller and Reneau for indemnity or contribution. Because there are factual issues in dispute re*349garding whether Reneau or Tiller was the owner of the ear involved in an accident with respondent Roopnarine John Singh, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

Singh and Reneau were involved in a ear accident in which Singh was injured. After the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API