Legal Opinion

Hardee v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

The parties to this proceeding were divorced in Florida. Hence, the petitioner has been well advised in point of procedure because the pertinent statute expressly prescribes that the custody of the child “of parents who have been divorced outside of North Carolina may be determined in a special proceeding instituted by either of the parents in the superior court of the county wherein the petitioner, or the respondent, or the child” resides at the commencement of the proceeding. G.S. 50-13; Phipps v. Vannoy, 229 N.C. 629, 50 S.E. 2d 906.

Petitioner did not request the court to find the facts or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Wilson v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Smith v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. In Re MeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API