Legal Opinion
Belitskus v. Hamlin Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
William M. Belitskus, pro se, appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of McKean County (trial court), which sustained the preliminary objections filed by the Hamlin Township Supervisors (Supervisors) in response to a complaint filed by Belitskus, wherein he alleged that the Township took official action in violation of the Sunshine Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 701-716. We affirm.
In his complaint, Belitskus maintains that the Supervisors violated the Sunshine Act by taking official action outside of an open meeting by sending a letter on June 4, 1999, to the McKean County…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sovich v. ShaughnessyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Lawrence County v. BrennerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Karl Smith Development Co. v. Borough of AspinwallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Conners v. West Greene School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Bologna v. St. Marys Area School BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Day v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Motor Coils MFG/Wabtec v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- J. Slusser, Admin. of the Estate of A. Slusser, and J. Slusser and E. Mancuso, h/w v. Black Creek Twp. ZHB, and J. Sidari and M. Sidari, h/wCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Peters Township v. RussellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.