Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Henry

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-11360-TPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as liquidating agent of New Heritage Bank (“New Heritage”), brings this action to recover a deficiency under two promissory notes executed and delivered to New Heritage by defendant Mark O. Henry in his capacity as trustee of Amie Realty Trust (the “Trust”), and guaranteed by Henry and George H. Schruender, Jr., individually. 1 Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment.

I

Background

This case was originally brought in Suffolk County Superior Court on October 22, 1990.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Steranko v. Inforex, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Pedro Antonio Aponte-Santiago v. Aurelio Lopez-Rivera, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Framingham Savings Bank v. TurkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Talmer Bank & Trust v. ParikhMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Pearson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Flushing Savings Bank v. RutkouskyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API