Legal Opinion
Framingham Savings Bank v. Turk
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided May 1, 1996No. 94-P-1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
After Framingham Savings Bank (FSB or the bank) foreclosed on two mortgages given by Gary Turk and Steven Turk, respectively, it brought actions in the District Court to recover deficiencies due on the loans that the mortgages had secured. The bank did so without having given prior written notice of its intent to pursue deficiencies, as prescribed by G. L. c. 244, § 17B. A judge of the District Court, having found the deficiencies to be $68,604.60 for Steven and $60,096.05 for Gary, ruled that, although FSB had not given the statutory notice, the brothers Turk each had received actual oral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Worldwide Commodities, Inc. v. J. Amicone Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Palumbo v. AudetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Wornat Development Corp. v. VakalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Galvin v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Sovereign Bank v. SturgisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Carmel Credit Union v. BondesonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Sargent D. Nichols, Individually and as He is Trustee of Andover Northway Realty Trust, Charles MacGill and Allan R. Ball v. The Cadle CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- BayBank v. SullivanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.