Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook Trust
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 30, 1996No. Civil Action 95-11780-GAOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
The plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) brought this action to recover on a promissory note and two guaranties. The defendants counterclaimed alleging breach of contract and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. The FDIC has now moved to dismiss the counterclaims and for. partial summary judgment on its complaint. The defendants, in turn, have moved for summary judgment on all claims in the complaint, contending that they have been discharged from their obli gations under the note and guaranties. For the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Mary E. Lawson and Matt Lawson v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Provident Co-Operative Bank v. James Talcott, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- FDIC v. Hopping Brook TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997