Legal Opinion
Heroux v. Ingrassio
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 6, 2009No. 08-CV-6412LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Bernard R. Heroux, Sr., has filed a pro se complaint against his former employer, CQC Prosthodontics, and two CQC employees, Robert F. Ingrassio and Jennifer Mahanger (collectively “defendants”). 1
Plaintiffs complaint sets forth a variety of claims relating to harassment and discrimination by defendants, and denial of various employment benefits. Specifically,plaintiff asserts that he was discriminated against on the basis of his national origin as a French Canadian in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kleehammer v. Monroe CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Claim of Rosa v. June Electrical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Rosa v. June Electrical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Continental Indemnity Company v. Bulson Management, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022