Legal Opinion

Crystal Car Line v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1946No. 6916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an adverse judgment in a case brought by the car companies under our Declaratory Judgment Act, Utah Code 1943, 104-64-1 et seq., to determine the right of the defendants and respondents herein to tax their cars. Although all the plaintiffs had separate causes of action, they joined in one action to avoid a multiplicity of suits, since the questions involved and the relief asked were the same in each instance.

All of the plaintiffs are non-residents and none of their cars were ever permanently within the state of Utah.

The tax commission had sought to collect taxes…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. New Orleans v. StempelSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Brumley v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Petterson v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. San Juan County v. Jen, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ryals v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API