Legal Opinion

Ryals v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C.J.

The legal question posed is whether the three-year statute of limitation provided for in § 110-1625, OCLA, applies to summary administrative procedure under which the State Tax Commission issues a distraint warrant for the collection of income taxes pursuant to § 110-1623. The trial court held in the affirmative.

There are two methods provided by law for the collection of income taxes: One, by action at law, § 110-1625, supra, and the other, by a summary proceeding, § 110-1623, supra. Under the summary proceeding statute, after the tax becomes due the tax commission shall issue a warrant under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Leet v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Giant Powder Co. v. Oregon Western Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Crystal Car Line v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Fisk v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gower v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gower v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Graydog Internet, Inc. v. GillerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Graydog Internet, Inc. v. GillerOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API