Graybow-Daniels Co. v. Pinotti
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a district court order granting a writ of mandamus. Gray-bow-Daniels Company (Graybow) brought this action for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the sheriff of Chisago County to accept its payment for redemption of property on which it holds a fourth mortgage. The trial court, based upon the stipulated facts submitted by the parties, granted the writ and ordered the redemption to proceed. This appeal is brought by intervenor, Merchants State Bank (Merchants), holder of the first three mortgages on the property in question.
The facts of this case were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pamperin v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Moore v. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Buchanan v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Parke v. HushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Bagley v. McCarthy Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re the Brainerd National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Community Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Page v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Page v. Consolidated Title & Abstract Co. (In re Brewery Ltd. Partnership)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Sieve v. RosarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.