Adam v. Folger
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northérn District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Circuit Judge.
The temporary injunction appealed from, entered at the suit of Folger, a citizen of Ohio, restrains Adam, a citizen of Illinois, from continuing to infringe letters patent No. 680,769, August 20, 1901, for improvements in water-heaters, and from using the name “Victor” on or in advertising any water-heater. Folger filed his application on May 31, 1895. Before this he had sold a number of heaters made in conformity to his specifications. He adopted the name “Victor” to denote the heater manufactured according to the specifications and embodying his inventions. Prior rto…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Denison Mattress Factory v. The Spring-Air CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Smith v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- Chicago Lock Co. v. TratschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.