Legal Opinion

Rice v. United States

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00858Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH BROK ARLIN RICE, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S Petitioner, [1] MOTION UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 2255

TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR v. CORRECT SENTENCE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00858-DBB Respondent. District Judge David Barlow Before the court is Petitioner Brok Arlin Rice’s (“Mr. Rice”) Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence.1 Mr. Rice moves the court to vacate or correct his sentence or grant a hearing to decide if New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen2 affects his case.3 For…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API