Legal Opinion

Sebree v. Rosen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1961No. 47330PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

This review involves controversies between the children, heirs at law, of Pete and Sarah Rosen (formerly Rosenwasser), with other descendants of said Pete and Sarah having contingent interests joined as parties defendant. The trial was under an amended petition of fourteen counts. A separate trial was ordered on Count XIV, the court retaining jurisdiction there-over. The record is lengthy. 1 It is not possible to refer to all of the many and varied factual situations and statements of the deceased settlors within reasonable limits. The purpose of the suit was to set…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Pulitzer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Loehr v. StarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. United States v. HutchersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Berkemeier v. RellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Erickson v. Civic Plaza National Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Sebree v. RosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. In Re the Estate of HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Sebree v. RosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API