Legal Opinion

Goes v. Feldman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 11, 1979PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

While the underlying dispute of the parties, which deals with the appropriate manner in which a landlord may tap a tenant’s security deposit, is relatively simple, this case presents threshold jurisdictional questions of some subtlety.

The plaintiffs brought their action under G. L. c. 93A and filed their complaint in the Housing Court 2 of the City of Boston. Although neither party raised a question of subject matter jurisdiction, the fact of a chapter 93A suit filed in a Housing Court sounds an alert in view of recent decisional and statutory developments concerning Housing Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  4. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Commonwealth v. DeCotisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. McGrath v. MisharaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Mellor v. BermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Blood v. Edgar's, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Bartlett v. Greyhound Real Estate Finance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API