Legal Opinion

William John Wacht v. Harold J. Cardwell and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 24, 1979No. 78-2258PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Wacht appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition. He claims that the state trial judge failed to inform him of his ineligibility for parole when he pled guilty. This, according to Wacht, means that his guilty plea was neither intelligently nor voluntarily made. We find that Wacht has failed to make sufficient factual allegations which would entitle him to any relief, arid affirm the denial of his habeas petition.

On October 30,1973, Wacht pled guilty to transportation of narcotics in violation of Ar.Rev.Stat. § 36-1002.02. The penalty provisions of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Richard O.J. Mayberry v. George Petsock, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Richard E. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Ricky Earp v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Lawrie v. SnyderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1998
  5. Wallace Levan Griffey v. Gary Lindsey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API