Legal Opinion
Richard O.J. Mayberry v. George Petsock, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 1987No. 85-3537PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
Facts
Petitioner Richard O.J. Mayberry appeals from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to exhaust state remedies. An examination of the lengthy procedural history of this case is necessary to our disposition of this appeal.
On December 9, 1966, following a tumultuous trial in state court in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, petitioner Mayberry and two co-defendants, Dominick Codispoti and Herbert Langnes, were found guilty by a jury of prison breach and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Zettlemoyer v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Palmer v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Andre Stanley Deputy v. Stanley Taylor, Warden, Sussex Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.