Legal Opinion
Wallace Levan Griffey v. Gary Lindsey, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 2003No. 99-17643PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEEZER, Circuit Judge.
Wallace Levan Griffey appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258. We hold that Griffey’s petition is governed by the substantive standards of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) and that Griffey was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on any of his claims. On the merits, we affirm the denial of Griffey’s habeas petition.
I
Griffey challenges his conviction on eleven criminal counts, including several counts of rape and burglary,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wallace Levan Griffey v. Gary Lindsey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Epps v. HowesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hernandez-Hernandez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Heppard v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Huynh v. LizarragaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.