Legal Opinion

State v. Hawk

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2005No. E2004-02315-SC-S09-CDPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · IiiFrank F. Drowota Iii, C. J.

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

Relying upon a common law rule, the trial court continued the defendant’s trial on the charge of accessory after the fact to first degree murder until after the trial and conviction of the principal offender. The defendant sought interlocutory review of the trial court’s order, asserting that her Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated by application of the common law rule. The Court of Criminal Appeals refused to grant the defendant’s application for an…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mooney v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. FarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lee Medical, Inc. v. Paula BeecherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State of Tennessee v. Marcus PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Arden v. KozawaTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Foster v. ChilesTennessee Supreme Court · 2015

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API