Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Sneed

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2000PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine whether an emergency medical technician is a “health care practitioner” within the meaning of Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-310(b) (Supp. 1999) and is therefore not entitled to immunity from liability under the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act. We conclude that the appellant emergency medical technicians are “health care practitioners” and are not entitled to immunity. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

On June 12, 1993, the minor plaintiff, Alexander Mooney, was a…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. PettusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hawks v. City of WestmorelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by165 opinions

  1. Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jones v. GarrettTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Webber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API