Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Estate of Bain

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1999PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, C.J.

We granted this appeal to decide whether a person who receives health care benefits under Tennessee’s medical assistance program (“TennCare”) must be “made whole” for his or her loss before the State is entitled to subrogation for any medical expenses it paid on the person’s behalf.

The trial court concluded that Tenn-Care, through its administrator, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee (“Blue Cross/Blue Shield”), was not entitled to subrogation because the insureds had not been made whole for their loss under a settlement agreement. The Court of Appeals reversed,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wilson v. Johnson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Biscan v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Waldschmidt v. Reassure America Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API