Legal Opinion

Wright v. North American Life Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1988No. 01476PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This appeal arises from a judgment entered in the lower court following an order granting summary judgment to the Defendant-Appellees. The action was filed by the Plaintiff-Appellants, seeking refunds of insurance premiums, as well as damages, in a dispute involving several insurance policies. Recovery was sought on several legal theories.

In Harris by Harris v. Easton Publishing Co., 335 Pa.Super. 141, 152, 483 A.2d 1377, 1382-83 (1984), our Court stated the following rules regarding the review of an appeal involving the question of the propriety of summary judgment:

Summary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Ritmanich v. Jonnel Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Richard Sabo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Loos Ex Rel. LoosDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API