Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Dally v. Woodall
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 9, 1932No. 6 Div. 77PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The petition was statutory quo warranto directed against the members of the board of eosmetological examiners of Jefferson county, under section 9932 of the Code. State ex rel. Knox v. Dillard, 196 Ala. 539, 72 So. 56; Berk v. State ex rel. Thompson, post, p.-, 142 So. 832; Gen. Acts 1931, p. 653.
The decision upholding the Barber’s Act (Gen. Acts 1931, p. 615) in Wages v. State (Ala. Sup.) 141 So. 707,1 under the police power of government, setting up governmental agencies (Berk v. State ex rel. Thompson, supra; Wright v. Aldridge, 219 Ala. 632, 123 So. 33; Lehmann v. State Board of Public…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnes v. State Ex Rel. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Masters v. PruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Smith v. KennedyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.