Legal Opinion

Roth Coal Co. v. Louisville & N. R.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM KNOX. Error to the Circuit Court of Knox County. — Hon. Yon A. Htjffaker, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This suit was originally instituted hy the coal company to recover of the Railroad Company the value of two cars of coal, which it was alleged the railroad company had unlawfully converted to its own use.

The Roth Coal Company are coal dealers in Knoxville. The coal company purchased said coal at Bern-stadt, Ky., where said coal was delivered to the railroad company, in September, 1917, to be transported to the coal company at Knoxville, Term. The railroad company converted said coal at Corbin, Ky., which town is in the vicinity of Bernstadt, Ky. This was during the coal strike, and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  2. Wallingford v. . KaiserNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. McCaull-Dinsmore Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1918
  4. Blackmer v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Downing v. OuterbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Barger v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lance Productions, Inc. v. Commerce Union BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. In re SeatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  5. Zimmern v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API