McCaull-Dinsmore Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
At Law. Action by the McCaull-Dinsmore Company against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company.
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
I hereby find the following facts established by the agreed written statement of facts and by the admissions of the parties:
Findings of Fact.(1) That the plaintiff was and is a corporation, duly created, organized, and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota, and a citizen of said state, having its principal place of business in the city of Minneapolis, county of Hennepin, state of Minnesota, and is a resident and inhabitant of said Fourth division.(2) That the defendant was and is a railway corporation of the state of Wisconsin and a citizen thereof, and was…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Otis McAllister & Co., a Corporation v. Skibs, A/s Marie BakkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Roth Coal Co. v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Brown Coal Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.