Parnell v. Peak Oilfield Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Two vehicles traveling in opposite directions at a curve on the Kenai Spur Highway hit a moose at nearly the same time; the impact killed the moose and left its carcass straddling the centerline. Both drivers left the scene. Soon after, another car rounded the curve, struck the carcass, and ran off the road, seriously injuring one of its occupants. Section 321 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts recognizes that a person whose actions have "created" a hazard owes a duty of due care to protect others from the danger. The main question raised here is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Des Jardins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ayuluk v. Red Oaks Assisted Living, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Hurn Ex Rel. D.H. v. GreenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Thompson v. CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.