Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Brandt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2009No. 2007AP187-DPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) has appealed a referee's report concluding that Attorney Warren Lee Brandt's multiple convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated did not represent a violation of former SCR 20:8.4(b).1 The referee found that Attorney Brandt did violate former *269SCR 20:5.3(b)2 by failing to adequately supervise an employee. Attorney Brandt has not appealed that conclusion. The referee recommended that Attorney Brandt be publicly reprimanded for violating former SCR 20:5.3(b). The OLR sought a 60-day suspension.

¶ 2. The OLR's appeal raises two issues:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CahillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against StearnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Elizabeth A. Ewald-HerrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API