Disciplinary Proceedings Against Brandt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) has appealed a referee's report concluding that Attorney Warren Lee Brandt's multiple convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated did not represent a violation of former SCR 20:8.4(b).1 The referee found that Attorney Brandt did violate former *269SCR 20:5.3(b)2 by failing to adequately supervise an employee. Attorney Brandt has not appealed that conclusion. The referee recommended that Attorney Brandt be publicly reprimanded for violating former SCR 20:5.3(b). The OLR sought a 60-day suspension.
¶ 2. The OLR's appeal raises two issues:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CahillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- In Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against StearnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
3Cited by16 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Elizabeth A. Ewald-HerrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.