Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. Horsch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 2017No. 2015AP001928-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
2Per curiam
We review the report and recommendation of Referee Richard M. Esenberg that Attorney Robert W. Horsch be publicly reprimanded for professional misconduct and that he pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $1,797.03 as of February 7, 2017. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) asked that, in addition to the public reprimand, the court impose various conditions on Attorney Horsch. The referee recommended that implementation of the conditions be suspended for a period of 90 days following this court's order imposing discipline. The referee made this recommendation because it…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
4Cited by5 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. TjaderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018