Western Wooden-ware Ass'n v. Starkey
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gratiot. (Daboll, J.) Bill to enjoin defendants from engaging in a manufacturing business, etc. Complainant appeals from decree dismissing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill in this cause is filed for the purpose of haying the defendants Starkey, Ferris, and Olmsted enjoined from engaging in the business of manufacturing pails, tubs, and other articles of wooden-ware during the period of five years from June 29, A. D. 1888; to enjoin the other defendants from carrying on that business with them; and to enjoin all the defendants from using certain premises in the village of St. Louis, Gratiot county, for the purpose of manufacturing tubs/*pails, etc. The bill *77asks for an accounting touching complainant’s damages, for a decree requiring the same to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Beal v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Phoenix Ins. Co. v. . Continental Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Mundy v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O. & W. Thum Co. v. TloczynskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Anchor Electric Co. v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Swigert & Howard v. TildenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Hitchcock v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Wright v. HakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.