Legal Opinion

J. L. Hudson Co. v. Barnett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 134, Calendar No. 35,597PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

J. L. Hudson Company, a Michigan corporation, plaintiff herein, sold to Louis Barnett, defendant, carpets for an apartment house. The parties entered into a title retention contract, the price of the property being fixed at $8,005.89, of which approximately one-fourth was to be paid in cash and the balance in equal monthly installments of $332.06 over a period of 18 months. There was included in the purchase price the sum of $376.48 for drilling holes to fasten the carpets to the floor, and $36.46 for insurance. After Barnett paid $2,486.24 on the purchase price and reduced the balance due to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Worthington v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Johnston v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Reynolds v. Newaygo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. BlombergWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Willis v. New World Van Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  3. Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  5. Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API