Legal Opinion
Quiles v. Parent
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2017No. G054353PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
A judgment debtor must bond a money judgment to stay its execution pending resolution of an appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 917.1, subd. (a)(1).) “However, no undertaking shall be required . . . solely for costs awarded under” section 1021 et seq. (§ 917.1, subd. (d).)
Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff Amanda Quiles and against defendant Arthur J. Parent, Jr. Parent satisfied the damages portion of the judgment. Parent’s appeal relates solely to the awards of attorney fees and costs that followed the initial entry of judgment. Parent did not satisfy or bond the awards…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Smith v. Diffee Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- 48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 972, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,527 Warren G. Herold v. Hajoca Corporation, Warren G. Herold v. Hajoca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Dowling v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Quiles v. Parent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Urs Corp. v. Venture, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Land Value Holdings, LLC v. Miller CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.