Legal Opinion
Quiles v. Parent
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 2, 2018No. G054353PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.
*1004INTRODUCTION
In this latest chapter in what originated as a wage and hour class action, defendant Arthur J. Parent, Jr. (Parent) appeals from the amended judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Amanda Quiles on her individual claim for wrongful employment termination in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA; 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ). (All further statutory references are to title 29 of the United States Code unless otherwise specified.) In addition to the damages awarded by the jury, the amended judgment awarded Quiles $689,310.04 in attorney fees and $50,591.69 in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. Diffee Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Boucher v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bank of the West v. MontalbanoDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Buchheim v. AnayaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Buchheim v. AnayaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.