Glitsos v. Kadish
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Judge.
This is an appeal from judgment against the defendant below, appellants herein, in the amount of $681.46, plus costs.
We are called upon to determine whether the doctrine of promissory estoppel may be applied to an agreement between the parties whereby the appellee, Kadish, refrained from bringing a suit to foreclose a materialman’s lien on appellants’ property in reliance upon appellants’ promise to pay a sum of money to Kadish.
After numerous pleadings by ■ various parties, the matter was submitted to the court, sitting without.a jury, on a stipulated statement of facts:
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Weiner v. RomleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Electrical Advertising, Inc. v. SakatoArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Yuma National Bank v. BalszArizona Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. AltherrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Costanzo v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Wahl v. Southwest Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Chewning v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.