Legal Opinion

Glitsos v. Kadish

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 6, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 228PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is an appeal from judgment against the defendant below, appellants herein, in the amount of $681.46, plus costs.

We are called upon to determine whether the doctrine of promissory estoppel may be applied to an agreement between the parties whereby the appellee, Kadish, refrained from bringing a suit to foreclose a materialman’s lien on appellants’ property in reliance upon appellants’ promise to pay a sum of money to Kadish.

After numerous pleadings by ■ various parties, the matter was submitted to the court, sitting without.a jury, on a stipulated statement of facts:

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Weiner v. RomleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Electrical Advertising, Inc. v. SakatoArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Yuma National Bank v. BalszArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. AltherrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Costanzo v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Wahl v. Southwest Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Chewning v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API